Aquatic elements

93

Whether swimming with sharks or acting as a body double, these women were made for the water, writes Shelley Seid

Is it possible that we evolved not from the ancestors of chimps and baboons but from apes who spent much of their time in an aquatic environment?

Elaine Morgan thinks so. She has written six books and countless papers on the subject and mainstream palaeontologists have taken her seriously enough to write a host more in response, many hotly disputing what has become known as the aquatic ape hypothesis. Simply put, unlike today's apes we humans are physically adapted to spending time in water.

Morgan, 90, has a masters from Oxford, two university fellowships, one honorary doctorate, and last year was appointed an officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE). She posits that our lack of body hair, our capacity to walk upright, our voluntary breath control and ability to mate face to face like other aquatic mammals mean we were originally naked apes living off a sea shore. And, taking the theory a step further, would it then be fanciful to attribute our attraction to water to a collective unconscious? Is our desire to be in water a primal urge?

9

Hodad
1 year ago

I just don't buy the ape thing. To each there own.
They found the chicken came 1st. Must have been made.

piss_shiver
1 year ago

Over where there own? :D I'm a bastard, and so is Stacey (a B****).

Kooktastic
1 year ago

I agree with Hodad. This theory is full of crappola. Humans are not adapted that well to the water.

If we were, then the fastest humans would be able to swim faster than 3mph. We wouldn't have to fight off the urge to panic when being held under by a wave. Beachgoers wouldn't drown when they wade into rip currents.

Throw a newborn baby into water and what happens? The poor thing would drown.

I could go on and on, but I'll just end with: Sorry Elaine. Your theory sucks.

Quadrafino
1 year ago

The great thing about science is that ideas and explanations can be revisited and revised as new evidence comes up. Morgan's idea is interesting if for nothing else it sparks a debate into human evolution and our true "habitat" on Earth. As a teenager I had a lot of doubt about Evolution but as the years have passed and I learned more I've come to see it as a great explanation for much of the natural world and human behavior as well. There is fantastic fossil and skeletal evidence (structures-left over bones in modern whales and dolphin) that whales evolved from wolf like creatures. So it could be plausible that a branch of the primate line of mammals could possibly head that way. Maybe not to the extent of whales and seals but possibly like birds that wade, float, or dive in the water???? Maybe not, but interesting to consider.

dakota
1 year ago

having a lot of letters after your name does not mean you are immune to dementia.

Hodad
1 year ago

@piss YES! you are. LMAO!! Their. I'm sure you are more then that. If I ever meet you I will point it out for ya. I mean if I'm going to make an ass of myself I can do that just fine on my own. I really don't need help pointing it out to everyone. As you can see. HAHA!
Back to the post.
Maybe it's more like just other breeds of people and or animals that existed and had died off. Not so much that that's what we were before. I mean we have many kinds of birds, dogs and , well I think you get the idea.

piss_shiver
1 year ago

Hodad, if it's one thing you aren't, it's a fake :)
So I'm sayin you ain't no Hodad, daddy-o :)

Sea-spout
1 year ago

The esteemed doctor "posits that our lack of body hair, our capacity to walk upright, our voluntary breath control and ability to mate face to face like other aquatic mammals mean we were originally naked apes living off a sea shore." I can remember positing similar theories while totally baked as an undergrad, except they involved aliens and abductions. But she's the smarter one for figuring out how to get paid for keeping up the BS.

piss_shiver
1 year ago

puff puff give
*passes to Senior Spout

Dingo
1 year ago

She looks pretty good for 90 years old (and English)!!

Odin
1 year ago

@KOOKTASTIC
I quote, "Throw a newborn baby into water and what happens? The poor thing would drown."

That's untrue, throw a newborn baby into water and they hold their breath. Later on in life young children forget how to hold their breath and must be retaught.

Kooktastic
1 year ago

@Odin: my point was they can't swim. So eventually it'd drown.

contrast that with a mammal adapted to water such as a seal which is born able to swim.

Login or register to post comments