Surflie's New Wave Calibration Scheme

2597

Surfli[n]e have reworked their reporting scheme (poor, fair etc) to make it "easier to understand". I know it's been a subject of debate here on StokeReport, so I thought I'd share what they have come up with. They think the +/- signs cause confusion.

* 1 = FLAT: Unsurfable or flat conditions. No surf.
* 2 = VERY POOR: Due to lack of surf, very poor wave shape for surfing, bad surf due to other conditions like wind, tides, or very stormy surf.
* 3 = POOR: Poor surf with some (30%) FAIR waves to ride.
* 4 = POOR to FAIR: Generally poor surf many (50%) FAIR waves to ride.
* 5 = FAIR: Very average surf with most (70%) waves rideable.
* 6 = FAIR to GOOD: Fair surf with some (30%) GOOD waves.
* 7 = GOOD: Generally fair surf with many (50%) GOOD waves.
* 8 = VERY GOOD: Generally good surf with most (70%) GOOD waves.
* 9 = GOOD to EPIC: Very good surf with many (50%) EPIC waves.
* 10 = EPIC: Incredible surf with most (70%) waves being EPIC to ride and generally some of the best surf all year.

Clear? Personally I'd say that this is much more confusing than the scheme that we use here. Thoughts?

5
Felix D
2 years ago

Wow, that didn't help at all. Now I have to figure out the difference between Poor, Fair, Good AND Epic, as well as contend with percentages.

I would love to have a system that calculates whether you should go out based on basic condition info and how far you live from the beach. For example, if there's poor surf at OB but I live 10 blocks away, I have no excuse not to go out. Therefore, my surf prediction would be: "Go surf, there's nothing else do to anyway."

If, however, there's poor surf and I live a 20 minute drive away through rush hour traffic, my prediction would be a little different: "Only worth it if you're nuts and your girlfriend's in a bad mood."

I just figure that most of us want to surf so long as it's not TOTALLY unsurfable, so why not keep it simple?

Login or register to post comments