Turning the Tide at Ocean Beach

1889

As an Army Corps of Engineers dredge dumped sand offshore, a crowd of politicians, representatives from local and federal agencies, business owners and volunteers gathered in a crumbling parking lot on Thursday to voice their support for the Ocean Beach Master Plan, a sweeping project to prepare for sea level rise and stem erosion on San Francisco’s western shore.

Project manager Benjamin Grant said that with more than a million dollars in grants now secured, the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) is ready to get down to the nitty-gritty details of how to implement the plan, which was officially released in June.

7
surfpunk
42 weeks ago

really? sand? never gonna work. one big storm and see ya sand. there is a comparable place called hatteras island in NC. and the wave energy there is significantly less than OB. sand moves, will move and we will have this conversation again in 3 to 5 years. anything endorsed by the army corp? do the opposite.

http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20110828/ARTICLES/110829710

sandcastle
42 weeks ago

Actually, sand is the answer. Yes, it moves faster than boulders. This makes it more expensive. But armoring the bluffs with boulders makes the problem worse. It just diverts the erosion elsewhere. Let's face it. most of the outer sunset is built on sand dunes. There is no long term permanent solution to change that, short of tearing down every building and trucking in billions of tons of concrete. Plus, with sea levels rising the whole damn neighborhood is going to be under water soon enough.

Tenderloin tom
42 weeks ago

Just make a big sandcastle ¥

Cazart
42 weeks ago

From what I've heard, there is no perfect answer, but the best answer is, "If you're losing your beach, get more beach." When you consider the fact that we're constantly dredging the ship channel anyway, there's the sand...let's make more beach. Certainly beats rip-rap.

sharkturd
42 weeks ago

It would find it troubling if sandcastle wasn't pro sand. But, as per the OB master plan article from a couple of weeks ago, this current sand placement op is a sort of litmus test on two different fronts. 1) to see how well it stops erosion and 2) how well it can protect the multi-gazillion dollar investment in our pollution control plant infrastructure, particularly the outflow pipe, from this winter's storms. They don't expect this temp-fix to last more than a year or two at best. But if the "experts" are pleased with the results there is talk of pumping sand directly to the beach from, as Cazart mentioned, the offshore channel dredging. Who knows, maybe we'll end up with a super bank wave...or not.

unfocused
42 weeks ago

Im with you T. i got a niece and nephew, twins. 3 1/2 years of age, right around your kids ages. We should just get all the kiddies together and let them build sand castles. Probably do more good then the politicians :)

Tenderloin tom
42 weeks ago

Sounds like a party

surfpunk
42 weeks ago

money and resources should be spent moving the things they are trying to protect, mainly a road and pipe that moves sewage. the fact that the ###### area IS a fill job (the whole area was wetlands) in the first place means the lake aka MARSH wants to join back/ connect with the ocean. until this is realized it is all just pissing into the wind. huge waste of time and money.

fatnewt
42 weeks ago

totally surfpunk, here's my representation of what ###### could like combining the MARSH with a sand castle...

Login or register to post comments